Share
Gratitude Journal Not Working? Prompts for Secret Love
Gratitude journaling is a legitimate practice, but in a complicated love it shows you only one side, the good one. In a situationship, a secret love, an affair or limerence you need both sides on the page before you can see what you want. Structured prompts over ninety days ask for both, so that the decision becomes yours again.
You've written down three good things a day for weeks, and one of them is usually the same person. The list is true and your days feel a little softer, yet you still don't know where you stand or what you want. That says little about your discipline and a great deal about the tool, which isn't the best fit for a situationship, a secret love, an affair or limerence.
Why isn't gratitude journaling working for you?
A gratitude journal asks one thing of you each day, which is to find what was good and write it down. In a settled life that works as intended. In a love you can't talk about, the good moments are rarely the problem, because you already replay them more than anything else.
What's missing is everything the list leaves out, such as the three days of silence before the warm message, the plan that was cancelled, or how you felt on Sunday night. When only the highlights reach the page, the page starts to agree with your hope, and you close the notebook no clearer than you opened it.
What does the research say gratitude journaling can do?
The best-known experiment came from Emmons and McCullough (2003), who asked people to list what they were grateful for and saw higher well-being on several, though not all, of their measures. The clearest effect was on positive affect, which is the pleasant feeling of the moment.
So gratitude journaling is a legitimate practice, and I'm not here to talk anyone out of it. My point is narrower: in a complicated love it shows one side, and I don't think that's the most fitting way to get clear.
Can gratitude keep you in a situationship longer?
The researchers studied established couples and not situationships or affairs, so I read their result as a mechanism and not as a verdict on your situation. The mechanism is still worth understanding, because each time you record the one generous thing someone did, you strengthen the feeling that tells you to stay close.
That matters most when warmth arrives unpredictably, as it does in the situationship hope cycle and in limerence. A list that only holds the warm days gives you an accurate record of the best days and no record of the rest. None of this says you should leave or stay, only that your record should be complete before you decide anything.
Why does secret love need a different kind of writing?
The same paper holds a finding that is easy to miss. When students wrote analytically about their happiest moments, their well-being was lower afterwards than in the group that simply replayed those moments in their minds. Good moments seem to do best when they're savoured, and hard ones when they're put into words and examined.
Lieberman and colleagues (2007) add part of the mechanism: naming a feeling in words reduced the amygdala's response to negative images. When you can't say it to a friend, the page is where the naming happens, and I describe the full method in emotional clarity journaling.
Gratitude journal or guided journal: what is the difference?
Both are legitimate, and which one you use is your decision. No trial has compared the two in people living with secret love, so the table sets out what each is designed to do, and the next three sections show how the guided version works day by day, using the Love in Secrecy Journal as the example.
| Gratitude list | Structured prompts over 90 days |
|---|---|
| Question it asks | |
| What was good today? | What was good, what was hard, what will I do for myself? |
| What reaches the page | |
| Only the good side | Both sides, warm days and hard ones |
| Over time | |
| The same question every day | A third question that changes every thirty entries |
| What you read back | |
| Good moments | What repeats |
| Fits best | |
| A settled life | A complicated love with an open question |
What do you write about a situationship or secret love in the first 30 days?
You begin on Day 1 with one question that comes before everything else: What do I want to know after these ninety entries? From then on the first question is the one a gratitude journal asks too, and the second is the one it leaves out. A day without contact gets its own line there, and those days belong to the record as much as the warm ones.
Take a single day. The first answer reads: they texted goodnight. The second records that you waited four hours for it with your phone in your hand. The third says you went for a run anyway, and the fourth that tomorrow you will make the plan for Saturday you keep postponing. All four are true, and only the first would have reached a gratitude list.
My journaling prompts for secret love offer more questions of this kind.
What do you write once a pattern starts to show?
Day 30 marks the change. You turn back to what you wrote on Day 1, read your thirty entries once more and answer one question: What keeps repeating without you having noticed? The weekly review is where patterns tend to surface, and it comes with one instruction that I consider the most important in the whole journal, which is to reread before you write.
- Read through your last seven entries once more and notice what stays with you.
- Write what you would have liked to say to them this week, and what repeated itself.
- Answer how much of this week you spent waiting.
Pennebaker, Mayne and Francis (1997) reanalysed six writing experiments with 177 participants and found that people whose use of insight and causal words increased had better physical health afterwards, though not better mental health.
How do you get clear on what you want in a situationship or secret love?
The last thirty entries of the Love in Secrecy Journal ask for it directly. The third question becomes: What from today do I want more of, and what no longer? Day 60 asks what you understand today that you did not yet understand on Day 30, and Day 90 ends with one sentence to complete: What I want after these ninety entries, as honestly as I can say it today.
A page that only holds the lovely moments can tell you that you care, which you knew already. With both sides in front of you, you can see whether this is enough for you, what you'd need for it to be, and how you want to live with it. Whatever you conclude, the decision is yours, and the journal does not ask you to leave, to stay, or to decide anything today.
Why does it take 90 days to see a pattern?
The research points in the same direction without prescribing a number, as I explain in ninety days of journaling. Guo (2023) pooled 31 trials with 4,012 participants and found that the effect of expressive writing is small, emerges with delay, and is stronger when sessions are one to three days apart.
When is writing not enough?
Nolen-Hoeksema (2000) found that a ruminative response style predicted new onsets of depressive episodes and anxiety symptoms over time, which is why I take circling thoughts seriously. If the 2am thought loop has become most of your nights, please talk to a mental health professional about it.
A record of your weeks can also give a therapist something concrete to work from. If you ever have thoughts of harming yourself, that is not a journaling matter. In the United States call or text 988, in the United Kingdom call 116 123, and elsewhere findahelpline.com lists local numbers.
Frequently asked questions
Is gratitude journaling bad for you?
No. Gratitude journaling is a legitimate practice, and a 2025 meta-analysis of 145 papers found that it leads to small increases in well-being. For a complicated love I don't think it's the most fitting way, because it records only the good side. Whether you keep it is entirely your decision.
Why does gratitude journaling make me feel worse?
It can feel worse when the list asks you to be content while a real question stays unanswered. Lyubomirsky and colleagues (2006) also found that analysing happy moments in writing lowered well-being compared with simply replaying them, whereas hard experiences did better when people wrote about them.
What should I write about in a situationship?
Start with what was good today and what was hard, what you did for yourself and the first thing you will do for yourself tomorrow. After thirty entries, ask what was good for you and what drained your strength. In the last thirty, ask what you want more of and what you no longer want.
Do I have to write every day for 90 days?
No. Ideally you write every day, because daily entries build the fullest record, and ten minutes are enough. There is no pressure, though: the Love in Secrecy Journal counts ninety entries rather than calendar days, so if you miss a day, you simply carry on. What matters for seeing a pattern is that hard days reach the page as well as good ones, and that the entries span enough weeks to compare.
Can a guided journal replace therapy?
No. A guided journal supports personal reflection and can sit alongside professional care, and it does not replace therapy or medical advice. If low mood, anxiety or sleeplessness have lasted for months, or if you have thoughts of harming yourself, please contact a mental health professional or a crisis line.
Where to start
If ninety entries feel like a lot to commit to right now, begin smaller. Start with the free Check-in: four questions, then the journal that fits your situation, and the mini-journal “Before you hit send” by email. The Emotional Clarity Calendar runs for thirty days. The Love in Secrecy Journal is there when you want the full ninety entries, and the Midnight Edition adds a mood check-in if you prefer a firmer frame. If you would rather read first, Writing the Unspoken is my guided eBook.
Sources
- Choi, H., Cha, Y., McCullough, M.E., Coles, N.A. and Oishi, S. (2025). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of gratitude interventions on well-being across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(28), e2425193122. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40627390 doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2425193122 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Davis, D.E., Choe, E., Meyers, J., Wade, N., Varjas, K., Gifford, A., Quinn, A., Hook, J.N., Van Tongeren, D.R., Griffin, B.J. and Worthington, E.L. (2016). Thankful for the little things: a meta-analysis of gratitude interventions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 20-31. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26575348 doi.org/10.1037/cou0000107 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Emmons, R.A. and McCullough, M.E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: an experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377-389. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12585811 doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Joel, S., Gordon, A.M., Impett, E.A., MacDonald, G. and Keltner, D. (2013). The things you do for me: perceptions of a romantic partner's investments promote gratitude and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(10), 1333-1345. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23885035 doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497801 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L. and Dickerhoof, R. (2006). The costs and benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life's triumphs and defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 692-708. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16649864 doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.692 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Lieberman, M.D., Eisenberger, N.I., Crockett, M.J., Tom, S.M., Pfeifer, J.H. and Way, B.M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421-428. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17576282 doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Pennebaker, J.W., Mayne, T.J. and Francis, M.E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 863-871. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9108699 doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.863 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Guo, L. (2023). The delayed, durable effect of expressive writing on depression, anxiety and stress: a meta-analytic review of studies with long-term follow-ups. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 272-297. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36536513 doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12408 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Yao, D., Xu, S., Liu, J., Gai, Y. and Li, J. (2025). Expressive writing for grief: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Research on Social Work Practice. doi.org/10.1177/10497315251371566 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
- Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(3), 504-511. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11016119 (retrieved 2 October 2026)
Simone Pleifer, MSc
Simone Pleifer, MSc, is the founder of Journals by Simone and the creator of the Emotional Clarity Journey system. She holds an MSc in Nutritional Science and has 14 years of experience in pharmaceutical clinical research. Her work bridges scientific rigour and emotional depth for people navigating secret love, situationships, and unspoken feelings. She is currently developing a supplement line to complement the ECJ system.
About Simone