Share
Grieving Someone Who Was Never Officially Yours
There was no breakup, no last conversation, and nobody you could tell. The loss is real anyway.
By Simone Pleifer · August 2026 · 5 min read
Founder of Journals by Simone. MSc in Nutritional Sciences. Over 14 years in clinical research in the pharmaceutical industry. Developer of a four-step journaling method for people carrying secret love, situationships and unspoken feelings.
When a love was never official, the ending comes without ritual and without witnesses. Grief research calls this disenfranchised grief. What helps is a goodbye you write yourself: name what is gone, say the sentence once, set a date, change one small thing.
There is no day it started and no day it ended. At some point the messages came less often, then not at all. You wrote twice more and then stopped, because you did not want to watch yourself waiting.
You are waiting for the moment when it hurts less, because it was never real anyway. That moment does not come. You reach for your phone before you remember there is nobody there, and you tell this person about your day in your head without meaning to. Someone asks how you are and you say fine, because the honest answer would take an hour and start with a confession.
None of this is an overreaction. What you are carrying has a name, an explanation, and a way through.
Why does it hurt so much when we were never together?
A love becomes real in your body long before it is real for anyone else. You built a person into your everyday life: the messages you waited for, the plans you quietly arranged around them, the version of you that came alive near them and went back in the drawer afterwards. That happens whether or not either of you ever said the word.
When it stops, you lose the everyday life along with the person. In the morning something is missing where the look at the phone used to be. Helen Fisher and her team studied ten women and five men who had recently been rejected and were still in love. What activated were the areas for reward, drive and craving, not only the ones for sadness. That is why it feels less like disappointment and more like withdrawal.
What is disenfranchised grief?
Ordinary grief has a shape. The people around you know what to say, there is a story everyone understands, and a rough sense of how long you are allowed to feel bad. A loss nobody saw gets none of that. Kenneth Doka named the pattern at the end of the eighties, and the term has long since been used far beyond death, for any bond whose ending nobody notices.
Secret love sits right in the middle of it. So does the affair that ended without a conversation, the person from work you never mentioned, the person who already belonged to someone else. Cesur-Soysal and Arı placed a breakup alongside other losses of this kind in OMEGA. How much grief and support counted as appropriate depended heavily on the case, both when judging others and when judging themselves. Part of it is denied to you. Part of it you deny yourself.
Why is it so hard to tell anyone?
That is exhausting in a very particular way. You cannot say you are grieving without first proving there was something to grieve, and that proof consists of details you kept to yourself for months. Often the whole thing was complicated on top of that, and you expect judgement rather than kindness. So you never start the sentence, and that is the same pattern as in Loving Someone in Secret is Exhausting.
| An open ending gives you | An unofficial ending leaves you with |
|---|---|
| A story other people already accept | A story you would have to defend |
| Sympathy you never have to ask for | Comfort you would have to ask for and explain |
| A clear day when it was over | An ending with no day at all |
| Room to be not okay for a while | Pressure to be okay immediately |
"A loss stays open as long as it only lives in your head. Written down, it becomes something that happened, instead of something that is still happening."
Simone Pleifer · Journals by Simone
Does writing actually help with grief?
Precision is worth it here, because most journaling promises claim more than the studies support. Yao et al. pooled thirteen trials on writing after a loss. The effect was small overall and became medium when people wrote repeatedly rather than once. What works is the accumulation, not the one big evening.
James Pennebaker has been saying the same thing for decades. It helps to assemble a story evening by evening until the experience has a shape. Brain research arrives at the same result from the other side. When Matthew Lieberman and his team had people put a feeling into words, activity in the amygdala dropped and rose in the regions responsible for control. What mattered was finding the word that fits, not stirring the feeling up.
How do you write yourself the goodbye nobody gives you?
A goodbye that waits for the other person never arrives when the bond never had a name. So you write it yourself. Four steps, in this order, across four evenings.
Write down what exactly is gone. Not the name, the thing behind it. The messages at a certain hour. Being known the way nobody else knew you. The future you quietly pictured. Grief gets lighter as soon as it is no longer one single large pain.
Write the sentence you could never say, and do not make it more reasonable than it is. Nobody reads this. The point is to stop carrying it in the drafts folder of your head, where it stays open.
An official ending has a date. Yours has none, so choose one and write it down. Not the day you stop feeling, but the day you stop waiting for the story to turn out differently. Grief with a date is grief you can eventually put down.
End with a decision small enough that you will keep it. Mute a chat. Take the other way home. Wait on purpose instead of writing. Something settles when a decision sits underneath it, and deliberately doing nothing is one.
These four evenings are the four-step method applied to an ending: notice, name, regulate, decide. The full method is in What Is Emotional Clarity Journaling. If the person at the centre never had a title, What Is a Situationship explains why not knowing keeps the question open, and if it gets loudest after midnight, How to Stop the 2am Thought Loop is about that hour.
One page in the evening, thirty evenings long
A guided reflection for exactly this kind of ending. One prompt a day, in a fixed order, so the loss gets a place instead of starting over every evening.
View the CalendarFrequently asked questions
Why does it hurt so much when we were never together?
Because a bond does not ask for a title. It grows out of time, closeness and feeling, and all of that was there. In a 2010 imaging study of people who had recently been rejected and were still in love, looking at that person activated the areas for reward and craving, the same ones involved in cocaine craving. The missing word changes who sees the loss. It does not change what you lost.
What is disenfranchised grief?
Disenfranchised grief is a loss that nobody openly names, publicly mourns, or helps carry. The term comes from grief researcher Kenneth Doka. Secret love, affairs, situationships and unspoken feelings all belong here, because the bond was never visible enough for its ending to count.
How do I let go of someone I never had?
You write yourself the goodbye instead of waiting for one. Name what is gone, not who. Say the unspoken thing once, in full, on paper. Choose a day on which it ends. Then decide one small thing you will do differently from now on. A goodbye that needs the other person to take part never arrives when the bond never had a name.
How large a loss is has never depended on whether it was official. You built something real in private, then it stopped, and the world moved on without noticing that anything had happened. That is lonely, and it is still something you can get through.
Give the grief a page and an order. Name what is gone, say the sentence once, set a date, choose one small change. And then let it be your goodbye, written by the only person who was there the whole time.
Sources
- Fisher, H.E., Brown, L.L., Aron, A., Strong, G. and Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60. doi.org/10.1152/jn.00784.2009 (retrieved 2 August 2026)
- Doka, K.J. (ed.) (1989). Disenfranchised Grief: Recognizing Hidden Sorrow. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. (retrieved 1 August 2026)
- Cesur-Soysal, G. and Arı, E. (2024). How we disenfranchise grief for self and other: An empirical study. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 89(2), 530–549. doi.org/10.1177/00302228221075203 (retrieved 1 August 2026)
- Yao, D., Xu, S., Liu, J., Gai, Y. and Li, J. (2025). Expressive writing for grief: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Research on Social Work Practice. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10497315251371566 (retrieved 1 August 2026)
- Pennebaker, J.W. and Beall, S.K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: Toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(3), 274–281. doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.95.3.274 (retrieved 1 August 2026)
- Lieberman, M.D., Eisenberger, N.I., Crockett, M.J., Tom, S.M., Pfeifer, J.H. and Way, B.M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421–428. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x (retrieved 1 August 2026)
Simone Pleifer, MSc
Simone Pleifer, MSc, is the founder of Journals by Simone and the creator of the Emotional Clarity Journey system. She holds an MSc in Nutritional Science and has 14 years of experience in pharmaceutical clinical research. Her work bridges scientific rigour and emotional depth for people navigating secret love, situationships, and unspoken feelings. She is currently developing a supplement line to complement the ECJ system.
About Simone